"I ate very sparingly of them on Sunday, and was very slightly indisposed in the evening.But on Christmas-day I almost dined on them, and was so ill that I was in great danger." This is the comparentia instantiarum secundum magis et minus."It cannot have been the brandy which I took with them.For I have drunk brandy daily for years without being the worse for it." This is the rejectio naturarum.Our invalid then proceeds to what is termed by Bacon the Vindemiatio, and pronounces that minced pies do not agree with him.
We repeat that we dispute neither the ingenuity nor the accuracy of the theory contained in the second book of the Novum Organum;but we think that Bacon greatly overrated its utility.We conceive that the inductive process, like many other processes, is not likely to be better performed merely because men know how they perform it.William Tell would not have been one whit more likely to cleave the apple if he had known that his arrow would describe a parabola under the influence of the attraction of the earth.Captain Barclay would not have been more likely to walk a thousand miles in a thousand hours, if he had known the place and name of every muscle in his legs.Monsieur Jourdain probably did not pronounce D and F more correctly after he had been apprised that D is pronounced by touching the teeth with the end of the tongue, and F by putting the upper teeth on the lower lip.We cannot perceive that the study of grammar makes the smallest difference in the speech of people who have always lived in good society.Not one Londoner in ten thousand can lay down the rules for the proper use of will and shall.Yet not one Londoner in a million ever misplaces his will and shall.Dr.Robertson could, undoubtedly, have written a luminous dissertation on the use of those words.Yet, even in his latest work, he sometimes misplaced them ludicrously.No man uses figures of speech with more propriety because he knows that one figure is called a metonymy and another a synecdoche.A drayman in a passion calls out, "You are a pretty fellow.", without suspecting that he is uttering irony, and that irony is one of the four primary tropes.The old systems of rhetoric were never regarded by the most experienced and discerning judges as of any use for the purpose of forming an orator."Ego hanc vim intelligo," said Cicero, "esse in praeceptis omnibus, non ut ea secuti oratores eloquentiae laudem sint adepti, sed quae sua sponte homines eloquentes facerent, ea quosdam observasse, atque id egisse; sic esse non eloquentiam ex artificio, sed artificium ex eloquentia natum." We must own that we entertain the same opinion concerning the study of Logic which Cicero entertained concerning the study of Rhetoric.A man of sense syllogises in celarent and cesare all day long without suspecting it; and, though he may not know what an ignoratio elenchi is, has no difficulty in exposing it whenever he falls in with it; which is likely to be as often as he falls in with a Reverend Master of Arts nourished on mode and figure in the cloisters of Oxford.Considered merely as an intellectual feat, the Organum of Aristotle can scarcely be admired too highly.But the more we compare individual with individual, school with school, nation with nation, generation with generation, the more do we lean to the opinion that the knowledge of the theory of logic has no tendency whatever to make men good reasoners.
What Aristotle did for the syllogistic process Bacon has, in the second book of the Novum Organum, done for the inductive process;that is to say, he has analysed it well.His rules are quite proper, but we do not need them, because they are drawn from our own constant practice.
But, though everybody is constantly performing the process described in the second book of the Novum Organum, some men perform it well and some perform it ill.Some are led by it to truth, and some to error.It led Franklin to discover the nature of lightning.It led thousands, who had less brains than Franklin, to believe in animal magnetism.But this was not because Franklin went through the process described by Bacon, and the dupes of Mesmer through a different process.The comparentiae and rejectiones of which we have given examples will be found in the most unsound inductions.We have heard that an eminent judge of the last generation was in the habit of jocosely propounding after dinner a theory, that the cause of the prevalence of Jacobinism was the practice of bearing three names.He quoted on the one side Charles James Fox, Richard Brinsley Sheridan, John Horne Tooke, John Philpot Curran, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Theobald Wolfe Tone.These were instantiae convenientes.He then proceeded to cite instances absentiae in proximo, William Pitt, John Scott, William Windham, Samuel Horsley, Henry Dundas, Edmund Burke.He might have gone on to instances secundum magis et minus.The practice of giving children three names has been for some time a growing practice, and Jacobinism has also been growing.The practice of giving children three names is more common in America than in England.In England we still have a King and a House of Lords; but the Americans are Republicans.The rejectiones are obvious.Burke and Theobald Wolfe Tone are both Irishmen: therefore the being an Irishman is not the cause of Jacobinism.Horsley and Horne Tooke are both clergymen; therefore the being a clergyman is not the cause of Jacobinism.Fox and Windham were both educated at Oxford; therefore the being educated at Oxford is not the cause of Jacobinism.Pitt and Horne Tooke were both educated at Cambridge; therefore the being educated at Cambridge is not the cause of Jacobinism.In this way, our inductive philosopher arrives at what Bacon calls the Vintage, and pronounces that the having three names is the cause of Jacobinism.
