登陆注册
26504500000024

第24章 SYSTEMS OF MYTHOLOGY(6)

The ancient classical schools of mythological interpretation, though unscientific and unsuccessful, are not without interest. We find philosophers and grammarians looking, just as we ourselves are looking, for some condition of the human intellect out of which the absurd element in myths might conceivably have sprung. Very naturally the philosophers supposed that the human beings in whose brain and speech myths had their origin must have been philosophers like themselves--intelligent, educated persons. But such persons, they argued, could never have meant to tell stories about the gods so full of nonsense and blasphemy.

Therefore the nonsense and blasphemy must originally have had some harmless, or even praiseworthy, sense. What could that sense have been? This question each ancient mythologist answered in accordance with his own taste and prejudices, and above all, and like all other and later speculators, in harmony with the general tendency of his own studies. If he lived when physical speculation was coming into fashion, as in the age of Empedocles, he thought that the Homeric poems must contain a veiled account of physical philosophy. This was the opinion of Theagenes of Rhegium, who wrote at a period when a crude physicism was disengaging itself from the earlier religious and mythical cosmogonic systems of Greece. Theagenes was shocked by the Homeric description of the battle in which the gods fought as allies of the Achaeans and Trojans. He therefore explained away the affair as a veiled account of the strife of the elements. Such "strife" was familiar to readers of the physical speculations of Empedocles and of Heraclitus, who blamed Homer for his prayer against Strife.

Is. et Osir., 48.

It did not occur to Theagenes to ask whether any evidence existed to show that the pre-Homeric Greeks were Empedoclean or Heraclitean philosophers. He readily proved to himself that Apollo, Helios, and Hephaestus were allegorical representations, like what such philosophers would feign,--of fire, that Hera was air, Poseidon water, Artemis the moon, and the rest he disposed of in the same fashion.

Scholia on Iliad, xx. 67. Dindorf (1877), vol. iv. p. 231.

"This manner of apologetics is as old as Theagenes of Rhegium.

Homer offers theological doctrine in the guise of physical allegory."Metrodorus, again, turned not only the gods, but the Homeric heroes into "elemental combinations and physical agencies"; for there is nothing new in the mythological philosophy recently popular, which saw the sun, and the cloud, and the wind in Achilles, Athene, and Hermes.

Grote, Hist, of Greece, ed. 1869, i. p. 404.

In the Bacchae (291-297), Euripides puts another of the mythological systems of his own time into the mouth of Cadmus, the Theban king, who advances a philological explanation of the story that Dionysus was sewn up in the thigh of Zeus. The most famous of the later theories was that of Euhemerus (316 B.C.). In a kind of philosophical romance, Euhemerus declared that he had sailed to some No-man's-land, Panchaea, where he found the verity about mythical times engraved on pillars of bronze. This truth he published in the Sacra Historia, where he rationalised the fables, averring that the gods had been men, and that the myths were exaggerated and distorted records of facts. (See Eusebius, Praep.

E., ii 55.) The Abbe Banier (La Mythologie expliquee par l'Histoire, Paris, 1738, vol. ii. p. 218) attempts the defence of Euhemerus, whom most of the ancients regarded as an atheist. There was an element of truth in his romantic hypothesis.

See Block, Euhemere et sa Doctrine, Mons, 1876.

Sometimes the old stories were said to conceal a moral, sometimes a physical, sometimes a mystical or Neo-platonic sort of meaning. As every apologist interpreted the legends in his own fashion, the interpretations usually disagreed and killed each other. Just as one modern mythologist sees the wind in Aeetes and the dawn in Medea, while another of the same school believes, on equally good evidence, that both Aeetes and Medea are the moon, so writers like Porphyry (270 A. D.) and Plutarch (60 A. D.) made the ancient deities types of their own favourite doctrines, whatever these might happen to be.

When Christianity became powerful, the Christian writers naturally attacked heathen religion where it was most vulnerable, on the side of the myths, and of the mysteries which were dramatic representations of the myths. "Pretty gods you worship," said the Fathers, in effect, "homicides, *****erers, bulls, bears, mice, ants, and what not." The heathen apologists for the old religion were thus driven in the early ages of Christianity to various methods of explaining away the myths of their discredited religion.

The early Christian writers very easily, and with considerable argumentative power, disposed of the apologies for the myths advanced by Porphyry and Plutarch. Thus Eusebius in the Praeparatio Evangelica first attacks the Egyptian interpretations of their own bestial or semi-bestial gods. He shows that the various interpretations destroy each other, and goes on to point out that Greek myth is in essence only a veneered and varnished version of the faith of Egypt. He ridicules, with a good deal of humour, the old theories which resolved so many mythical heroes into the sun; he shows that while one system is contented to regard Zeus as mere fire and air, another system recognises in him the higher reason, while Heracles, Dionysus, Apollo, and Asclepius, father and child, are all indifferently the sun.

Granting that the myth-makers were only constructing physical allegories, why did they wrap them up, asks Eusebius, in what WEconsider abominable fictions? In what state were the people who could not look at the pure processes of Nature without being reminded of the most hideous and unnatural offences? Once more:

同类推荐
  • 佛为娑伽罗龙王所说大乘法经

    佛为娑伽罗龙王所说大乘法经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 非相

    非相

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 法句譬喻经

    法句譬喻经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 佛说灌洗佛经

    佛说灌洗佛经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • Toys of Peace

    Toys of Peace

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
热门推荐
  • 湛蓝核心

    湛蓝核心

    宇宙无垠无际,已知与未知的存在都是命运的一部分。宇宙中没有平凡与不凡,只有彰显自身的存在,才会拥有所谓的不凡。“湛蓝核心已装载,弑徒号,出动!”
  • 末世之恶魔纪元

    末世之恶魔纪元

    李圣一莫名其妙地回到了末日来临之前,他发现自己居然融合了魔源,晋升为魔人存在。后来他更是惊奇地发现,自己所掌控的史莱姆之力,似乎有些不同……
  • 总载的赖皮甜心

    总载的赖皮甜心

    她极其嗜血却喜欢伪装,因为它;他非常温柔心只有她,从小陪着她长大,她却从不知道他的存在,知道有一天的偶遇,他知道自己非她不可,她......
  • 亿万婚约:腹黑金主纯纯妻

    亿万婚约:腹黑金主纯纯妻

    有人说,她美的像个妖孽,能让那个冷冽嚣张的男人为她掀翻一座城!有人说,她清纯的像一朵摇曳百合,与之言谈,就能度化人的心灵!她曾是个弃女,寄人篱下规行矩步;她曾是个弱者,低眉颔首与泪为伍。然而,当蝴蝶破茧而出、当凤凰浴火涅槃——你是否认得出,她,竟是她?!书友群:308176885
  • 狼狗桑克

    狼狗桑克

    狼狗桑克是新文明世纪的一条野生犬,人类的破坏使他进入了城市,并被善良的女科学家于珊收养,一切似乎都很美好,然而,在一次疯狗袭击路人的案件后,桑克和其他的狗都成了众矢之的,而桑克也发现,曾经的家园破坏并没有那么简单,也许他是该做点什么了……
  • 嚣张太妃为后记

    嚣张太妃为后记

    一朝穿越却被告知她就要侍寝,对象还是一个“芳龄”四十多的皇帝老头,阴差阳错之下却成了人人羡慕的宠妃。然而她的好日子并没有多久,皇上驾崩,所有妃子陪葬?机智如她跟未来皇上讨了个太妃位置坐坐。嘿嘿,看到那些如花似玉的儿媳见到她都要向她请安她就觉得很舒心,偶尔几个心高气傲的,没关系,老娘有的是办法收拾你。可是,怎么回事?继子虎视眈眈看着她是几个意思?好吧,她惹不起总躲得起吧!皇上阴测测的说道:“朕看上的东西,还没有能够逃得出手掌心的。”顺手掐断她惹的几朵桃花。行,是你选择的那就别后悔,看我不把你后宫闹地天翻地覆,顺便讨个皇后的宝座坐坐。且看一个后宫妃子,如何从太妃逆袭成皇后……。
  • 武魂碑

    武魂碑

    望着这大好山河,看着别人快意人生,怎么也想不到自己不过就是救了一个人,就惹上了数不尽的麻烦。一切就像是命中注定,又像是偶然搅入死局。或许自己本该平庸一生,但是却又被强行架上了天下苍生。韩世全自嘲了两句,手中转动一把折扇,翻身上马,“走,去前面看看还有啥等着我!”
  • 推理大师讲故事:世界上最跌宕起伏的N个推理故事

    推理大师讲故事:世界上最跌宕起伏的N个推理故事

    险象环生,疑案连连;悬念迭起,凶险诡异。美好的温存之下却暗藏杀机,亲密的挚友之间竟不共戴天,笑容的背后隐藏着另一张面孔……本书遴选了多篇代表世界推理小说界中最高水平的作品,从而让读者在纷乱的迷宫里探索智慧灵感的出路,在虚拟的环境里磨练敏锐的观察力,在精彩的故事中体验水落石出的快感。步步凶险,步步陷阱,步步推论,步步为营,但真相最终只有一个。本书是一本拿起来就不愿放下的推理集锦;本书是一个走进去就不愿离开的数十位世界著名推理大师邀你一起体验。
  • 极道之手

    极道之手

    你是卑微的活着?还是奋起一搏?小白领霍森目睹一场异能者的战斗,仅仅是十几秒的时间,让他踏出平凡人的笼子。
  • 升仙门

    升仙门

    修道原从苦中来,但得清闲处便清闲,此即是道。赵子林喝酒喝到甲醛,命在旦夕,经医院抢救,终于脱离险境。却被查出自己身患肝癌,相恋六年的女友居然是一个妖怪!张子林该何去何从?这是一个无比凄美的爱情故事;也是一段修真界的传奇。。(本书努力更新中,新人求收藏推荐!各位如果觉得少的话,可以先养着,养肥以后再杀)